Feature #1544
Add Collision to the sandbox
| Status: | Resolved | Start date: | 06/19/2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | J. Moringen | % Done: | 100% | |
| Category: | - | |||
| Target version: | - |
Description
Please add Collision to trunk and 0.7 branches. Thx
0001-added-new-rst-type-Collision-to-sandbox.patch 
(1.44 KB)
0001-Added-CollisionGeometry-which-describes-the-contact-.patch
(1.24 KB)
0002-Added-ObjectCollision-which-describes-a-collision-of.patch
(1.35 KB)
0003-Added-RobotCollision-with-describes-a-collision-of-r.patch
(2.16 KB)
0005-removed-required-operator-for-fields-of-ObjectCollis.patch
(1.14 KB)
0006-renamed-ObjectCollision-field-in-RobotCollision.patch
(898 Bytes)
Associated revisions
Added CollisionGeometry which describes the contact points of a collision
refs #1544
Added ObjectCollision which describes a collision of two objects
refs #1544
Backport: Added CollisionGeometry which describes the contact points of a collision
refs #1544
Backport: Added ObjectCollision which describes a collision of two objects
refs #1544
Backport: Added RobotCollision with describes a collision of robot with itself or other things
refs #1544
Added RobotCollision with describes a collision of robot with itself or other things
fixes #1544
History
#1 Updated by J. Moringen almost 11 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Assignee set to J. Moringen
#2 Updated by J. Moringen almost 11 years ago
- File 0001-Added-CollisionGeometry-which-describes-the-contact-.patch added
- File 0002-Added-ObjectCollision-which-describes-a-collision-of.patch added
- File 0003-Added-RobotCollision-with-describes-a-collision-of-r.patch added
- Status changed from In Progress to Feedback
In the attachments 0001-Added-CollisionGeometry…, 0002-Added-ObjectCollision…. 0003-Added-RobotCollision…, I split the original commit and type into three commits of three types:
rst.kinematics.CollisionGeometry(could later be extended with collision normals etc.)rst.kinematics.ObjectCollisionrst.robot.RobotCollision
to increase coherence and reusability.
I also changed some names and documentation comments to comply with our guidelines.
@Daniel, Christian: would these changed types still be suitable for your needs?
@Arne, Johannes, Sebastian: do you think the organization into separate types makes sense?
@Christof, Robert: since you have experience with modeling collisions, do you have any suggestions?
#3 Updated by J. Moringen almost 11 years ago
@Daniel: did you have time to look at the suggested changes?
#4 Updated by D. Seidel almost 11 years ago
@Jan: I am waiting for Christian, who is on a trip this week (and some part of the next I think), to discuss the changes. We will answer as soon as we came to talk about it!
#5 Updated by D. Seidel almost 11 years ago
- File 0005-removed-required-operator-for-fields-of-ObjectCollis.patch added
- File 0006-renamed-ObjectCollision-field-in-RobotCollision.patch added
Updated new types according to our discussion, removing the required fields for the ObjectCollision and renaming the ObjectCollision variable in the RobotCollision
#6 Updated by D. Seidel almost 11 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset rst-proto|commit:77d83399b20d2424e0e4c1896e78f4da9027acc0.