Bug #487
Converters for fundamental types are not implemented [Python]
Status: | Resolved | Start date: | 08/08/2011 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
Assignee: | J. Moringen | % Done: | 100% | |
Category: | Python | |||
Target version: | rsb-0.9 |
Associated revisions
Added Uint64Converter in rsb/transport/converter.py
refs #487
refs #487
- rsb/transport/converter.py: added class Uint64Converter; register
Uint64Converter - test/convertertest.py: added minimal unit test for Uint64Converter
Add converter for uint32.
refs #487
Added missing converters for fundamental types in rsb/converter.py
fixes #487
- rsb/converter.py (header): updated copyright
(makeStructBasedConverter): new function; dynamically construct
converter class which uses struct.[un]pack
(Uint64Converter): removed
(Uint32Converter): likewise - test/convertertest.py (header): updated copyright
(makeStructBasedConverterTest): new function; dynamically construct
test case for struct-based converter
(suite): use makeStructBasedConverterTest
Added ScopeConverter class in rsb/converter.py
refs #487
- rsb/converter.py (header): updated copyright
(ScopeConverter): new class; (de)serializes Scope objects - test/converter_test.py (header): updated copyright
(ScopeConverterTest): new class; test case for ScopeConverter class
Mention new Python ScopeConverter in news.rst
refs #487
- news.rst (RSB 0.15): mention new Python ScopeConverter
Register ScopeConverter in rsb/converter.py
refs #487
- rsb/converter.py (toplevel): register ScopeConverter
History
#1 Updated by J. Moringen over 12 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Assignee changed from J. Wienke to J. Moringen
#2 Updated by J. Moringen over 11 years ago
- % Done changed from 0 to 30
#3 Updated by J. Wienke about 11 years ago
- Target version changed from rsb-0.10 to rsb-0.9
uint32 is missing
#4 Updated by J. Moringen about 11 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- % Done changed from 30 to 100
Applied in changeset rsb-python|commit:e2356fa9b9991ba04706f64f78228711e66350c8.
#5 Updated by J. Moringen about 11 years ago
- Subject changed from Converters for Fundamental Types are not Implemented to Converters for fundamental types are not implemented
#6 Updated by J. Moringen almost 8 years ago
- Subject changed from Converters for fundamental types are not implemented to Converters for fundamental types are not implemented [Python]