Tasks #601
Consolidate RST Types
Status: | Resolved | Start date: | 09/30/2011 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
Assignee: | - | % Done: | 100% | |
Category: | - | |||
Target version: | - |
Description
Due to the fact that RSB is now deployed and used in some projects, people will also start using RST in an increasing manner. As this is currently a part of the framework which is directly exposed to the users, we need to get it (sort of) stable for some core datatypes and its organization as fast as possible. Hence, we should...
- Discuss naming and structure
- Discuss what is necessary to include RST in versioning
- Discuss how to install includes
- Present our sketch at the next CITEC TF meeting
Related issues
History
#1 Updated by S. Wrede over 12 years ago
- Description updated (diff)
#2 Updated by S. Wrede over 12 years ago
- Status changed from New to Feedback
- % Done changed from 0 to 30
Johannes summarized nicely what we decided on yesterday afternoon:
https://code.cor-lab.org/projects/rst/wiki/Structure_Proposal
Arne any myself will prepare an initial change proposal.
#3 Updated by S. Wrede over 12 years ago
- % Done changed from 30 to 40
Arne and myself started with some re-organization of proto-Files in the RST library.
Our proposal for the three package names is motivated briefly here:
https://code.cor-lab.org/projects/rst/wiki/Type_Overview
#4 Updated by J. Wienke over 12 years ago
- Status changed from Feedback to In Progress
- Assignee changed from S. Wrede to J. Wienke
I will start with refactoring the rest now.
#5 Updated by J. Wienke over 12 years ago
- % Done changed from 40 to 60
folder structure and build system updated to new proposal
#6 Updated by S. Wrede over 12 years ago
Thanks for this first reorganization!
A quick comment: I'd propose to rename
- imageprocessing to
vision
(because it is the semantic category, processing is unnecessary and vision allows more than images) - audioprocessing to
audition
(audition seems to be the equivalent term here)
(and both terms are just shorter...)
Good start, anyway!
#7 Updated by J. Wienke over 12 years ago
- % Done changed from 60 to 80
content consolidation still missing
#8 Updated by J. Wienke over 12 years ago
- % Done changed from 80 to 90
Several coding conventions have been fixed now and also documented in the wiki. However, the content discussion about types remains. E.g. is a Translation a Point3D?
#9 Updated by J. Moringen over 12 years ago
- Target version deleted (
0.5)
#10 Updated by J. Wienke over 12 years ago
How do we proceed here? Otherwise this will stay open endlessly.
#11 Updated by J. Wienke about 12 years ago
- Assignee changed from J. Wienke to J. Moringen
Jan, has this been done now with th 1.0 release? If so we should close this and add the version to the issue.
#12 Updated by J. Moringen about 12 years ago
- Assignee deleted (
J. Moringen)
No, this was unrelated, I think.
#13 Updated by J. Wienke about 12 years ago
How will we ever resolve this? ;)
#14 Updated by S. Wrede about 12 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- % Done changed from 90 to 100
That is quite a long time ago and was an initial reminder to set up some organizational structures in RST. We did that and I will close this issue now.