Activity

From 10/27/2014 to 11/25/2014

01:25 PM Bug #2099: Engine has direct protobuf dependencies: From the point of view of this engine, there is no chance to get around this right now. We would need an extension in... J. Wienke
12:20 PM Bug #2099: Engine has direct protobuf dependencies: I do not have too much inside regarding the actual code, but our impression was that converter registration might be ... Anonymous
11:54 AM Bug #2099: Engine has direct protobuf dependencies: Huh? How should this work right now if RST is completely protobuf-based? J. Wienke
11:49 AM Bug #2099 (Feedback): Engine has direct protobuf dependencies: What about removing the protobuf dependency from the rst API? Wouldn't that be a good idea anyway (considering future... Anonymous
11:43 AM Bug #2099: Engine has direct protobuf dependencies: I'm not quite happy with this solution. Once you use a transitive dependency directly in your own code, you should de... J. Wienke
12:02 PM Bug #2109: Wrong handling of external content with two filters of the same type: The filter is just intended for testing purposes (therefore it resides in the @test@ path) and in that context there ... J. Wienke
11:06 AM Bug #2109 (Feedback): Wrong handling of external content with two filters of the same type: It's actually not a problem of the engine, but of the @TestFilter@ class, where @externalContent@ is static (took me ... Anonymous

02:57 PM Revision 6ba7e5c5: Variable name typo: Arne Nordmann
01:41 PM Bug #2109 (Rejected): Wrong handling of external content with two filters of the same type: My use case is to have a state with two transitions, the condition/guard being @RSBEventOnScope@ filter with two diff... Anonymous

02:20 PM Bug #2099 (Resolved): Engine has direct protobuf dependencies: Applied in changeset commit:7b66229a4842d0ca5cf50e981c2d728b03d7242f. N. Köster
02:17 PM Bug #2099 (Feedback): Engine has direct protobuf dependencies: in RSXUtils.java is a reference to com.google.protobuf.Message which should not be necessary as this is a implementat... N. Köster
02:19 PM Revision 7b66229a: * removed protobuf dependency, fixes #2099: N. Köster

09:58 PM Revision 97a7142b: Remove timeout in call action: Since there is currently no way to specify the timeout from the DSL
part, it is harmful to have one right now. Once w... J. Wienke

02:07 PM Revision 69c381d4: Fix sending something else than Void data: The unit tests did not find a bug in setting the data class since it
uses the inprocess transport, which does not con... J. Wienke

Also available in: Atom