Activity
From 07/21/2013 to 08/19/2013
08/19/2013
- 07:01 PM Bug #1596 (Resolved): protobuf needs to be declared as a real requirement
- The setup.py for rsb-python erroneously declares protobuf only as a setup dependency and not as an installation depen...
- 06:50 PM Bug #1595 (Resolved): rsb-python cannot be installed from pypi
- The new version handling prevents the installation from a source distribution.
- 08:40 AM Enhancement #1024 (Resolved): Add Transport class [Java]
- Has been done in the context of the socket transport implementation.
- 08:34 AM Enhancement #1548: Transports returned by ParticipantConfig::getTransports() should be mutable
- I don't think this is easily possible, because internally we manage a map from name to transport class for checking d...
- 08:29 AM Bug #1158 (Resolved): Sequence number increment is not atomic
- Applied in changeset rsb-cpp|commit:3ac129a352ffc2281912bc478869447f17940e72.
- 08:19 AM Bug #1158 (In Progress): Sequence number increment is not atomic
- This seems to be fixed already by a mutex. I will reduce visibility of the counter to ensure locked access.
- 08:25 AM Feature #726 (Resolved): Implement Connector Subsystem in Java
- This has been solved while implementing #713.
08/09/2013
- 07:49 PM RSB XML Support Tasks #1587 (In Progress): Release version 0.9
08/08/2013
- 02:59 PM Bug #1589 (Resolved): Something is wrong with the index page
- The rsb-python-0.7 job published to that wrong location. I have fixed the job and deleted the files on cordocs once a...
- 09:05 AM Bug #1589: Something is wrong with the index page
- I deleted that entry two days ago from the server. If it appeared again we probably do something wrong with the upload.
- 02:26 PM Tasks #1562 (Resolved): Release version 0.9
- 12:02 PM Tasks #1562: Release version 0.9
- I have created a pull request to update the homebrew formulas:
https://github.com/swrede/homebrew-formulas/pull/12 - 02:22 PM Tasks #1563 (Resolved): Write news entry for 0.9 release
- news#34
08/07/2013
- 01:53 AM Bug #1589 (Resolved): Something is wrong with the index page
- http://docs.cor-lab.org/ » rsb-python
There is an entry called trunk/html which should probably not be there. - 05:10 PM Bug #1588 (Resolved): Failing test in timesync sub-project
- For maybe 1 out of 3 executions of the test suite, I see this failure:...
- 11:11 AM RSB XML Support Tasks #1587 (Resolved): Release version 0.9
08/06/2013
- 07:18 PM Tasks #1563: Write news entry for 0.9 release
- We are happy to announce the release of version 0.9 of the RSB middleware. Version 0.9 is the direct successor of 0.7...
- 02:13 PM Tasks #1563 (In Progress): Write news entry for 0.9 release
- Here is a draft for the new release text. Feel free to adapt inside this message:
We are happy to announce the rel... - 03:02 PM Tasks #1562: Release version 0.9
- Narf, for the versioning system to work we need to define the "Checkout/merge to local branch (optional)" to 0.9. Oth...
08/05/2013
- 06:01 PM Tasks #1562 (In Progress): Release version 0.9
- 04:12 PM Bug #1585 (Resolved): rsb-trunk-maven-deploy sometimes fails
- There were two race conditions. They have been fixed in commit:rsb-java|df3b1918 and commit:rsb-java|be28f9bd.
08/03/2013
- 04:33 AM Bug #1207 (Resolved): Cobertura-based coverage testing does not seem to work with Java 1.7
- Applied in changeset rsb-java|commit:ff17c0dd008697f70dad27bd0319f4475ab87712.
08/02/2013
- 05:34 PM Bug #1585: rsb-trunk-maven-deploy sometimes fails
- Apart from the real problem I can also see this:...
- 05:26 PM Bug #1585: rsb-trunk-maven-deploy sometimes fails
- Weird, I can only reproduce this on the ci server slave precise64
- 04:55 PM Bug #1585 (Resolved): rsb-trunk-maven-deploy sometimes fails
- Somewhere in socket transport.
- 01:00 PM Bug #1297 (Resolved): Failing tests in rsb-integration-tests
- Done with gar installer in /vol/default and setting SPREAD_PYTHON_ROOT for the slave.
- 04:44 AM Bug #1297 (In Progress): Failing tests in rsb-integration-tests
- Seems to mostly resolved by our recent socket transport improvements.
@Johannes: there are 14 remaining test failu... - 04:40 AM Tasks #1583 (Resolved): Update socket transport specs
- Applied in changeset rsb-manual|commit:b0b5d25d8aa330912008f95fbf5681f041c6bd1a.
08/01/2013
- 05:17 PM Tasks #1584 (New): Prevent termination of BusServer when client connections exist
- Sometimes it might be a good idea to prevent the termination of the bus server in case there are still active client ...
- 04:57 PM Bug #1582 (Closed): Socket transport seems to damage transfered byte sequences
- This might be fixed now as we have fixed a possible race condition for sending notifications. Here, two sending threa...
- 04:54 PM Tasks #1583 (Resolved): Update socket transport specs
- * Fix handshake sequence (too many reads and write)
* Add shutdown sequence - 04:54 PM Tasks #1048: Specify disconnect protocol for socket transport
- Shutdown sequence has been implemented using the TCP possibilities in java, python and c++.
What is still missing ...
07/31/2013
- 10:43 AM Bug #1582 (Closed): Socket transport seems to damage transfered byte sequences
- I observed several errors in protobuf deserialization, e.g. like this one...
- 10:29 AM Tasks #1581 (Resolved): Remove disconnected connection in BusServer
- Applied in changeset rsb-java|commit:3f7ed064742695ecbcb12d7fdeb7414e63070688.
07/30/2013
- 12:50 PM Tasks #1581 (Resolved): Remove disconnected connection in BusServer
- Currently the BusServer continuously tries to dispatch new events to all connections that registered during its lifet...
07/26/2013
- 04:31 PM Feature #1575 (Resolved): Java might prefer IPv6 addresses over IPv4 which prevents communication...
- Applied in changeset rsb-manual|commit:90ee0944231db94ff82ffceb5881d7c74d2c10d5.
- 09:32 AM Feature #1575: Java might prefer IPv6 addresses over IPv4 which prevents communication with C++
- Processes which act as bus clients should probably try IPv4 and IPv6 addresses when connecting. Where possible, bus s...
- 09:25 AM Feature #1575: Java might prefer IPv6 addresses over IPv4 which prevents communication with C++
- What do you mean by both? I don't know whether there actually is a chance to bind to IPv4 and IPv6 in parallel with j...
- 09:22 AM Feature #1575: Java might prefer IPv6 addresses over IPv4 which prevents communication with C++
- I agree and don't know of any alternatives.
We should probably look into using both, IPv4 and IPv6, in all impleme... - 09:11 AM Feature #1575 (In Progress): Java might prefer IPv6 addresses over IPv4 which prevents communicat...
- I don't think there is a chance to force the use of IPv4 simply by using Inet4Addresses inside the java code. E.g. on...
- 04:10 PM Feature #725 (Resolved): Disable Spread by Default
- 09:56 AM Feature #725: Disable Spread by Default
- OK, I removed the "blocked-by" relation. We can close this issue now, right?
- 09:42 AM Feature #725: Disable Spread by Default
- Jan Moringen wrote:
> @Johannes: What do you think about the earlier comment:
> > Now that I look at it, implementi... - 09:27 AM Feature #725: Disable Spread by Default
- The Python code has the socket transport enabled by default. Thus, Spread should be disabled by default.
@Johannes... - 09:21 AM Feature #725: Disable Spread by Default
- Isn't this done for python? I just committed the respective change for java. If python is done, we can close this issue.
- 04:09 PM Bug #1577 (Resolved): rsb-java-trunk-maven-deploy has test errors from socket transport
- I do not understand the details, but this got resolved by commit:rsb-java|f1d87e6239d71cb30e6f7cdd5c3663544de29291
- 09:17 AM Bug #1577 (Resolved): rsb-java-trunk-maven-deploy has test errors from socket transport
- I don't know why, but test do not run properly for the maven deploy job with "address already in use" errors for the ...
- 02:09 PM Bug #1576 (Resolved): Applications using the socket transport do not terminate correctly
- Applied in changeset rsb-java|commit:f1d87e6239d71cb30e6f7cdd5c3663544de29291.
- 09:22 AM Bug #1576 (In Progress): Applications using the socket transport do not terminate correctly
- Ok, then I will also follow this approach.
- 09:20 AM Bug #1576: Applications using the socket transport do not terminate correctly
- The other implementations use reference counting for this.
- 09:16 AM Bug #1576 (Resolved): Applications using the socket transport do not terminate correctly
- Applications using the socket transport in java do not terminate correctly. The problem is that due to the BusServer ...
- 01:39 PM Feature #1012 (Resolved): Change default configuration to enable only socket transport
- Applied in changeset rsb-java|commit:c5d54fa7caef543974fca71a713f2ffc14498212.
07/25/2013
- 08:16 PM Feature #1575 (Resolved): Java might prefer IPv6 addresses over IPv4 which prevents communication...
- Solution:
* Add a new property to prefer IPv4 and set it to true - 07:23 PM Feature #713 (Resolved): Implement socket-based transport
- Applied in changeset rsb-java|commit:2f6223413796f8ffc27d2577642d3c51d4a584fb.
07/22/2013
- 05:42 AM Bug #1571 (Resolved): 0.7 version does not build on MacOS
- See https://ci.cor-lab.org/job/rsb-cpp-0.7-macos/
Probably related to #1570
Also available in: Atom