Activity
From 10/10/2018 to 11/08/2018
11/07/2018
- 03:19 PM Feature #2782 (Resolved): Config loader and Transport registry
- C# RSB has now a config loader and a transport registry.
- 03:15 PM Enhancement #2781 (Resolved): Fixed a FIXME for a atomic increment
- Informer has now an atomic increment for the sequence numbers.
- 03:14 PM Bug #2780 (Resolved): Wrong folder for a file
- A file got in the wrong folder. Just moved it to the right place.
10/29/2018
- 12:57 PM Tasks #2779: Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec maven repo
- Okay, don't get me wrong, I am totally happy about using protobuf 3 but when do you plan to release rst 0.18 with pro...
- 08:15 AM Tasks #2779: Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec maven repo
- So far we have always used the default protobuf version of the current Ubuntu LTS. Since bionic this is protobuf 3.0....
10/28/2018
- 06:55 PM Tasks #2779: Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec maven repo
- hmm, I am a little bit confused. You uploaded rsb 0.18.4 but your uploaded version depends on protobuf 3 (rsb:rsb:jar...
10/26/2018
- 02:35 PM Tasks #2779 (Resolved): Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec mave...
- 0.18 is released on the citec repo. master will not be pushed anymore.
- 01:25 PM Tasks #2779: Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec maven repo
- M. Pohling wrote:
> but at least 0.18 was never released.
The 0.18 release is not done yet. You can check the pro... - 01:11 PM Tasks #2779: Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec maven repo
- ok, the deployed 0.19-Snapshot seems to be up-to-date but at least 0.18 was never released.
- 01:08 PM Tasks #2779 (Resolved): Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec mave...
- I am not sure if the maven artifact deployment is covered by our ci pipeline and just broken or if this is a manual p...
- 02:13 PM Bug #2775 (Resolved): Participant state pattern is not synchron with isActive check.
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-java|ab34e1bffefee86bdac7b295d10f40226a7c9b5f.
10/25/2018
- 04:29 PM Bug #2774 (Resolved): Participant deactivation is blocking forever if the interrupted exception i...
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-java|7dcfa051ba2c9fa98104217466084841e2065c1f.
10/24/2018
- 05:00 PM Feature #2766 (Resolved): RSB RPC pattern
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-net|c96a85da53c39e66f2b1df0e5da84de8d16ca7f7.
- 01:10 PM Feature #2766: RSB RPC pattern
- fixed callbacks
10/23/2018
- 04:28 PM Feature #2765 (Resolved): Implementation of a factory
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-net|1a642d2e51f6c8e976b3f2bf686a83d354424d5d.
- 04:25 PM Feature #2766: RSB RPC pattern
- One minor issue: please remove the commented change to the logger configuration in the test program.
- 04:03 PM Bug #2774: Participant deactivation is blocking forever if the interrupted exception is not recov...
- Actually, I don't see how we should solve this without client help. We need interruption to enable a fast deactivatio...
- 11:33 AM Bug #2774: Participant deactivation is blocking forever if the interrupted exception is not recov...
- Its an user code stability issue.
Just execute the example code and you will see that the deactivation method block... - 11:03 AM Bug #2774: Participant deactivation is blocking forever if the interrupted exception is not recov...
- I don't see who interrupts whom at which time in the test code. When should the interruption take place?
- 04:00 AM Enhancement #2770 (Resolved): Improve Participant creation
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-net|cc5776cd929a8c6f0dfae76721a123deb08b6a42.
10/22/2018
- 09:44 PM Bug #2773 (Resolved): Internal invoke nullpointer not handeled.
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-java|50bbc72bd6aad9d32c34991c4a95ee89166a5228.
- 04:25 PM Bug #2773: Internal invoke nullpointer not handeled.
- The callback should always return an instance of @Event@. @null@ is not allowed here and also not mentioned as a poss...
- 04:36 PM Feature #2766: RSB RPC pattern
- Just rebased
- 04:32 PM Feature #2765: Implementation of a factory
- Sure...
- 04:11 PM Feature #2765: Implementation of a factory
- Could you please move hostname and port to some socket-specific class until a configuration system exists. Some Stub ...
- 04:14 PM Bug #2771 (Resolved): UserInfo were not serialized
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-net|6d0bf08682dcd4b02f423a809024e4f40952779a.
10/17/2018
- 03:53 PM Bug #2777 (Resolved): Async send future is not canceled after remote server is deactivated.
- *error* Async send future is not canceled after remote server is deactivated.
*
setup* spread configured via global... - 03:51 PM Bug #2776 (Resolved): Synchronized send is still blocking after remote server is deactivated.
- *error* Synchronized send is still blocking (until timeout) after remote server is deactivated. Would be nice if the ...
- 03:43 PM Bug #2775 (Resolved): Participant state pattern is not synchron with isActive check.
- *error* java.lang.IllegalStateException: deactivate() cannot be called in state StateInactive
*setup* spread confi... - 03:40 PM Bug #2774 (Resolved): Participant deactivation is blocking forever if the interrupted exception i...
- *error* blocking forever when the interrupted exception is not recovered.
*setup* spread configured via global con... - 03:34 PM Bug #2773 (Resolved): Internal invoke nullpointer not handeled.
- *error* nullpointer not handeled.
*setup* spread configured via global config file but no spread started.
*test...
10/15/2018
- 10:31 AM Enhancement #2772: Uniformed path for System-Config in Windows
- Nope, the preferred path is %%USERPROFILE%%\AppData\Local\<MyCompany>\<MyApp> (see the link above)
Honestly, the onl...
10/12/2018
- 10:58 AM Enhancement #2772: Uniformed path for System-Config in Windows
- Is the .config prefix used on windows normally for the user configuration?
Also available in: Atom