Meetings2011-06-20¶
Topics¶
- Data type relation to Channel/Scope 1:1?
- Informer semantics: polymorphic or restricted to certain data types?
- Add an "any" type for informers?
- Multiple parallel scope structures of different categories?
- How to keep type names unique? Registry?
- We need conflict detection at runtime
- Guideline for generating names
- How much do we want to depend on the nameservice?
- Common data type repository
- Do we need advertisement?
Lessons Learned¶
- Extensibility of data types without recompiling is required
- Tool support: life view
- Deep introspection with content display
- IDL specs provided by name service to keep message size small?
Next Steps¶
- kein 60 Mio Dreiecke
- WBS Funktionale Komponenten portieren
- Swissranger, Kinect, Videos
- (Compressed) streams? - brauchen wir das, common format erarbeiten
- für Bildverarbeitung eigentlich nicht brauchbar
- stream codecs könnten konstante Framerate liefern bei unterschiedlicher Kompression
- streaming mit geringer priorität
- as fast possible
- low latency
- 1:n
- (Compressed) streams? - brauchen wir das, common format erarbeiten
- wrap ICL algorithms and components
TODO: present use cases next time