Meetings2014-03-17 » History » Version 3

« Previous - Version 3/13 (diff) - Next » - Current version
S. Wrede, 03/17/2014 03:06 PM

Meetings2014-03-17¶

Currently, we lack the possibility to group participants and treat these as a kind of "component".
We (Jan, Arne, Sebastian) consider such a group of participants useful.
Features that relate to this notion of "components/groups/composites" could be:
- Assign transport configurations
- Assign common scope prefixes
- Describe "component" interfaces (cf. RSB DSL) for the involved participants
Should "components/groups/..." be restricted to a single process?