Activity

From 10/14/2018 to 11/12/2018

03:19 PM Feature #2782 (Resolved): Config loader and Transport registry: C# RSB has now a config loader and a transport registry. S. Barut
03:15 PM Enhancement #2781 (Resolved): Fixed a FIXME for a atomic increment: Informer has now an atomic increment for the sequence numbers. S. Barut
03:14 PM Bug #2780 (Resolved): Wrong folder for a file: A file got in the wrong folder. Just moved it to the right place. S. Barut

12:57 PM Tasks #2779: Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec maven repo: Okay, don't get me wrong, I am totally happy about using protobuf 3 but when do you plan to release rst 0.18 with pro... M. Pohling
08:15 AM Tasks #2779: Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec maven repo: So far we have always used the default protobuf version of the current Ubuntu LTS. Since bionic this is protobuf 3.0.... J. Wienke

06:55 PM Tasks #2779: Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec maven repo: hmm, I am a little bit confused. You uploaded rsb 0.18.4 but your uploaded version depends on protobuf 3 (rsb:rsb:jar... M. Pohling

02:35 PM Tasks #2779 (Resolved): Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec mave...: 0.18 is released on the citec repo. master will not be pushed anymore. J. Wienke
01:25 PM Tasks #2779: Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec maven repo: M. Pohling wrote:
> but at least 0.18 was never released.
The 0.18 release is not done yet. You can check the pro... J. Moringen
01:11 PM Tasks #2779: Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec maven repo: ok, the deployed 0.19-Snapshot seems to be up-to-date but at least 0.18 was never released. M. Pohling
01:08 PM Tasks #2779 (Resolved): Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec mave...: I am not sure if the maven artifact deployment is covered by our ci pipeline and just broken or if this is a manual p... M. Pohling
02:13 PM Bug #2775 (Resolved): Participant state pattern is not synchron with isActive check.: Applied in changeset commit:rsb-java|ab34e1bffefee86bdac7b295d10f40226a7c9b5f. J. Wienke

04:29 PM Bug #2774 (Resolved): Participant deactivation is blocking forever if the interrupted exception i...: Applied in changeset commit:rsb-java|7dcfa051ba2c9fa98104217466084841e2065c1f. J. Wienke

05:00 PM Feature #2766 (Resolved): RSB RPC pattern: Applied in changeset commit:rsb-net|c96a85da53c39e66f2b1df0e5da84de8d16ca7f7. S. Barut
01:10 PM Feature #2766: RSB RPC pattern: fixed callbacks S. Barut

04:28 PM Feature #2765 (Resolved): Implementation of a factory: Applied in changeset commit:rsb-net|1a642d2e51f6c8e976b3f2bf686a83d354424d5d. S. Barut
04:25 PM Feature #2766: RSB RPC pattern: One minor issue: please remove the commented change to the logger configuration in the test program. J. Wienke
04:03 PM Bug #2774: Participant deactivation is blocking forever if the interrupted exception is not recov...: Actually, I don't see how we should solve this without client help. We need interruption to enable a fast deactivatio... J. Wienke
11:33 AM Bug #2774: Participant deactivation is blocking forever if the interrupted exception is not recov...: Its an user code stability issue.
Just execute the example code and you will see that the deactivation method block... M. Pohling
11:03 AM Bug #2774: Participant deactivation is blocking forever if the interrupted exception is not recov...: I don't see who interrupts whom at which time in the test code. When should the interruption take place? J. Wienke
04:00 AM Enhancement #2770 (Resolved): Improve Participant creation: Applied in changeset commit:rsb-net|cc5776cd929a8c6f0dfae76721a123deb08b6a42. S. Barut

09:44 PM Bug #2773 (Resolved): Internal invoke nullpointer not handeled.: Applied in changeset commit:rsb-java|50bbc72bd6aad9d32c34991c4a95ee89166a5228. J. Wienke
04:25 PM Bug #2773: Internal invoke nullpointer not handeled.: The callback should always return an instance of @Event@. @null@ is not allowed here and also not mentioned as a poss... J. Wienke
04:36 PM Feature #2766: RSB RPC pattern: Just rebased S. Barut
04:32 PM Feature #2765: Implementation of a factory: Sure... S. Barut
04:11 PM Feature #2765: Implementation of a factory: Could you please move hostname and port to some socket-specific class until a configuration system exists. Some Stub ... J. Wienke
04:14 PM Bug #2771 (Resolved): UserInfo were not serialized: Applied in changeset commit:rsb-net|6d0bf08682dcd4b02f423a809024e4f40952779a. S. Barut

03:53 PM Bug #2777 (Resolved): Async send future is not canceled after remote server is deactivated.: *error* Async send future is not canceled after remote server is deactivated.
*
setup* spread configured via global... M. Pohling
03:51 PM Bug #2776 (Resolved): Synchronized send is still blocking after remote server is deactivated.: *error* Synchronized send is still blocking (until timeout) after remote server is deactivated. Would be nice if the ... M. Pohling
03:43 PM Bug #2775 (Resolved): Participant state pattern is not synchron with isActive check.: *error* java.lang.IllegalStateException: deactivate() cannot be called in state StateInactive
*setup* spread confi... M. Pohling
03:40 PM Bug #2774 (Resolved): Participant deactivation is blocking forever if the interrupted exception i...: *error* blocking forever when the interrupted exception is not recovered.
*setup* spread configured via global con... M. Pohling
03:34 PM Bug #2773 (Resolved): Internal invoke nullpointer not handeled.: *error* nullpointer not handeled.
*setup* spread configured via global config file but no spread started.
*test... M. Pohling

10:31 AM Enhancement #2772: Uniformed path for System-Config in Windows: Nope, the preferred path is %%USERPROFILE%%\AppData\Local\<MyCompany>\<MyApp> (see the link above)
Honestly, the onl... S. Barut

Also available in: Atom