Framework Comparison » History » Version 8
S. Wrede, 01/15/2011 04:28 PM
| 1 | 1 | S. Wrede | h1. ROS Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | S. Wrede | |
| 3 | 3 | S. Wrede | Please note: We are comparing RSB against roscore not against ROS! |
| 4 | 3 | S. Wrede | |
| 5 | 2 | S. Wrede | h2. Functional Differences |
| 6 | 1 | S. Wrede | |
| 7 | 3 | S. Wrede | h3. Facts |
| 8 | 7 | S. Wrede | |
| 9 | 3 | S. Wrede | * ROS provides topic-based pub-sub, RSB provides an m:n event bus. |
| 10 | 3 | S. Wrede | |
| 11 | 1 | S. Wrede | h3. Wishes |
| 12 | 7 | S. Wrede | |
| 13 | 7 | S. Wrede | * We believe in the power of reflection and self-description, such that |
| 14 | 8 | S. Wrede | ** a generic content-based subscription model, e.g., with path-based access such as XPath becomes feasible |
| 15 | 7 | S. Wrede | ** messages can be generally understood by everyone even if parts are not accessible |
| 16 | 3 | S. Wrede | * RSB shall provide better introspection features, both for programmtic access (e.g., for anomaly detection) but also for developers |
| 17 | 2 | S. Wrede | |
| 18 | 1 | S. Wrede | h1. ROS Integration |
| 19 | 1 | S. Wrede | |
| 20 | 1 | S. Wrede | Potential strategies: |
| 21 | 1 | S. Wrede | |
| 22 | 1 | S. Wrede | * (Generic) Bridge Component |
| 23 | 1 | S. Wrede | * ROS Port (ROS as a transport, mapping to our concepts) |
| 24 | 1 | S. Wrede | * RSB Integration in ROS |
| 25 | 1 | S. Wrede | |
| 26 | 1 | S. Wrede | Ideas: |
| 27 | 1 | S. Wrede | |
| 28 | 1 | S. Wrede | * Naming maintains features sets (which component understands what on which framework) |