RosIntegration » History » Version 2
Version 1 (J. Moringen, 06/08/2011 06:12 PM) → Version 2/7 (J. Wienke, 06/10/2011 05:41 PM)
h1. ROS Integration
Potential Strategies:
* (Generic) Bridge Component
* ROS Port (ROS as a transport, mapping to our concepts)
* RSB Integration in ROS
Ideas:
* Naming maintains features sets (which component understands what on which framework)
Experiences:
* No grammar for IDL available
* XMLRPC nameserver protocol must be implemented by hand
** half specified
Potential Strategies:
* (Generic) Bridge Component
* ROS Port (ROS as a transport, mapping to our concepts)
* RSB Integration in ROS
Ideas:
* Naming maintains features sets (which component understands what on which framework)
Experiences:
* No grammar for IDL available
* XMLRPC nameserver protocol must be implemented by hand
** half specified