Feature #593

Implement Meta-Converter for Domain- to Protobuf-Type Conversion

Added by S. Wrede over 12 years ago. Updated over 8 years ago.

Status:ClosedStart date:09/28/2011
Priority:NormalDue date:
Assignee:S. Wrede% Done:

20%

Category:C++Estimated time:4.00 hours
Target version:rsb-0.13

Description

Check OpenCVImage converter for a first inspiration. However, in the end we want to have a base class encapsulating the additional ProtBuf converter and the respective calls to it.


Related issues

Related to Robotics Systems Types - Tasks #604: Document Best Practices for Developing User-Type to RST-T... Resolved 10/01/2011

History

#1 Updated by J. Wienke over 12 years ago

Shouldn't the title be RST and not RSB?

#2 Updated by S. Wrede over 12 years ago

  • Subject changed from Implement Meta-Converter for Domain- to RSB-Type Conversion to Implement Meta-Converter for Domain- to RST-Type Conversion
  • Status changed from New to In Progress
  • Priority changed from Urgent to Normal
  • Target version changed from 0.5 to rsb-0.10
  • % Done changed from 0 to 20

In the context of the AMARSi project and, more specifically, in the RCI library, we now developed a set of converters that do this specifically for a number of datatypes. Probably, they can be a basis for extracting the useful generic implementation concepts for this use case.

#3 Updated by J. Wienke over 12 years ago

  • Subject changed from Implement Meta-Converter for Domain- to RST-Type Conversion to Implement Meta-Converter for Domain- to Protobuf-Type Conversion

#4 Updated by S. Wrede over 12 years ago

  • Target version changed from rsb-0.10 to rsb-0.9

#5 Updated by J. Moringen almost 11 years ago

  • Target version changed from rsb-0.9 to rsb-0.10

#6 Updated by J. Moringen over 10 years ago

  • Target version changed from rsb-0.10 to rsb-0.11

#7 Updated by J. Moringen over 9 years ago

  • Target version changed from rsb-0.11 to rsb-0.12

#8 Updated by J. Wienke almost 9 years ago

  • Target version changed from rsb-0.12 to rsb-0.13

#9 Updated by J. Moringen over 8 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Closed

Probably not necessary as the amount of duplicated effort for each new domain-specific converter is low.

Also available in: Atom PDF