Activity
From 03/02/2013 to 03/31/2013
03/28/2013
- 06:12 PM Feature #1326 (In Progress): Expose rsb:*random-state* or similar to control pseudo-randomness of...
03/27/2013
- 06:53 PM Enhancement #1121 (Resolved): Move reloading of Spread library into cl-spread
- The system is now called @network.spread@.
- 03:03 PM Enhancement #1083: Implement communication with congestion control (for reader interface)
- I think, this should be tackled as part of our more general flow control plans. Just delaying for now, though.
- 03:01 PM Bug #1124 (Closed): Debian package rsb-tools-cpp0.7 depends strictly on rsb0.7 ...
- I'm closing this since I cannot find an rsb0.7-with-spread package anymore. Reopen if necessary.
03/23/2013
- 07:27 AM Feature #1442: RPC should support argumentless methods properly
- It should be part of the feature-branch, cf.:
https://code.cor-lab.org/projects/rsb/repository/rsb-java/revisions/...
03/22/2013
- 05:24 PM Feature #1442: RPC should support argumentless methods properly
- Sorry, I cannot find the new signatures. Did your commit include all changes?
- 05:17 PM Feature #1442 (Feedback): RPC should support argumentless methods properly
- Initial support is available in: "9a4cd505a9eba2939637623b55b7713cde7eda49":https://code.cor-lab.org/projects/rsb/rep...
03/15/2013
- 09:47 AM Bug #366 (Closed): License of ROS transport
- This is no longer true due to a rewrite of the part in question.
03/11/2013
- 03:20 PM Bug #1232 (Resolved): Incorrect Debian package dependency in rsb-tools-cpp0.8
- Applied in changeset rsb-tools-cpp|commit:afd3c9660fbccbb0b299c4d81b61f7cacd80501e.
03/09/2013
- 10:20 AM RSBag Bug #1091 (Resolved): Replaying to different channel does not work
- Applied in changeset rsbag-cl|commit:f61fcfa0aa354d8750e84d175981632e533ed0ae.
03/07/2013
- 05:44 PM Bug #1251 (Resolved): The current versioning scheme of RSC/RSB is inconsistent
- 03:53 PM Bug #1445 (Resolved): Non-existent Debian package is mentioned in RSB installation instructions
- Applied in changeset rsb-tools-cl|commit:72f7b9a3d1e8f6f9559a1edc8a8e3b4f1751a5e6.
03/06/2013
- 09:49 AM Bug #1398: System configuration files are expected in /etc/ instead of $prefix/etc
- Sorry, the RSC changes are pushed now.
Actually I understand the immediate reaction, but when implementing this I ... - 03:47 AM Support #1169 (Resolved): Provide Debian Package for Spread
03/05/2013
- 08:07 PM Bug #1398 (Feedback): System configuration files are expected in /etc/ instead of $prefix/etc
- I initially misread the change. Also, I cannot find a version of @rsc::config::configure@ which accepts a prefix as f...
- 09:34 AM Bug #1398: System configuration files are expected in /etc/ instead of $prefix/etc
- Can you please have a look at the documentation in the feature branch. This was kind of hard to modify the graph corr...
- 08:55 AM Bug #1398: System configuration files are expected in /etc/ instead of $prefix/etc
- No, fixed in branch. I will also modify the documentation accordingly. Is it ok then?
03/04/2013
- 07:14 PM Bug #1398: System configuration files are expected in /etc/ instead of $prefix/etc
- One of the three @configure@ calls in @Factory::Factory()@ does not use the prefix. Is this intentional?
- 07:04 PM Bug #1398: System configuration files are expected in /etc/ instead of $prefix/etc
- Jan, there is an implementation in the feature branch. Can you have a look whether that solves the problem?
- 06:23 PM Bug #1398 (In Progress): System configuration files are expected in /etc/ instead of $prefix/etc
- 06:20 PM Support #1169 (Rejected): Provide Debian Package for Spread
- We have such a package since some time.
Also available in: Atom