Activity
From 09/29/2018 to 10/28/2018
10/28/2018
- 06:55 PM Tasks #2779: Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec maven repo
- hmm, I am a little bit confused. You uploaded rsb 0.18.4 but your uploaded version depends on protobuf 3 (rsb:rsb:jar...
10/26/2018
- 02:35 PM Tasks #2779 (Resolved): Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec mave...
- 0.18 is released on the citec repo. master will not be pushed anymore.
- 01:25 PM Tasks #2779: Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec maven repo
- M. Pohling wrote:
> but at least 0.18 was never released.
The 0.18 release is not done yet. You can check the pro... - 01:11 PM Tasks #2779: Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec maven repo
- ok, the deployed 0.19-Snapshot seems to be up-to-date but at least 0.18 was never released.
- 01:08 PM Tasks #2779 (Resolved): Please upload the current rsb-java 0.18 + 0.19-Snapshot to the citec mave...
- I am not sure if the maven artifact deployment is covered by our ci pipeline and just broken or if this is a manual p...
- 02:13 PM Bug #2775 (Resolved): Participant state pattern is not synchron with isActive check.
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-java|ab34e1bffefee86bdac7b295d10f40226a7c9b5f.
10/25/2018
- 04:29 PM Bug #2774 (Resolved): Participant deactivation is blocking forever if the interrupted exception i...
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-java|7dcfa051ba2c9fa98104217466084841e2065c1f.
10/24/2018
- 05:00 PM Feature #2766 (Resolved): RSB RPC pattern
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-net|c96a85da53c39e66f2b1df0e5da84de8d16ca7f7.
- 01:10 PM Feature #2766: RSB RPC pattern
- fixed callbacks
10/23/2018
- 04:28 PM Feature #2765 (Resolved): Implementation of a factory
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-net|1a642d2e51f6c8e976b3f2bf686a83d354424d5d.
- 04:25 PM Feature #2766: RSB RPC pattern
- One minor issue: please remove the commented change to the logger configuration in the test program.
- 04:03 PM Bug #2774: Participant deactivation is blocking forever if the interrupted exception is not recov...
- Actually, I don't see how we should solve this without client help. We need interruption to enable a fast deactivatio...
- 11:33 AM Bug #2774: Participant deactivation is blocking forever if the interrupted exception is not recov...
- Its an user code stability issue.
Just execute the example code and you will see that the deactivation method block... - 11:03 AM Bug #2774: Participant deactivation is blocking forever if the interrupted exception is not recov...
- I don't see who interrupts whom at which time in the test code. When should the interruption take place?
- 04:00 AM Enhancement #2770 (Resolved): Improve Participant creation
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-net|cc5776cd929a8c6f0dfae76721a123deb08b6a42.
10/22/2018
- 09:44 PM Bug #2773 (Resolved): Internal invoke nullpointer not handeled.
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-java|50bbc72bd6aad9d32c34991c4a95ee89166a5228.
- 04:25 PM Bug #2773: Internal invoke nullpointer not handeled.
- The callback should always return an instance of @Event@. @null@ is not allowed here and also not mentioned as a poss...
- 04:36 PM Feature #2766: RSB RPC pattern
- Just rebased
- 04:32 PM Feature #2765: Implementation of a factory
- Sure...
- 04:11 PM Feature #2765: Implementation of a factory
- Could you please move hostname and port to some socket-specific class until a configuration system exists. Some Stub ...
- 04:14 PM Bug #2771 (Resolved): UserInfo were not serialized
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-net|6d0bf08682dcd4b02f423a809024e4f40952779a.
10/17/2018
- 03:53 PM Bug #2777 (Resolved): Async send future is not canceled after remote server is deactivated.
- *error* Async send future is not canceled after remote server is deactivated.
*
setup* spread configured via global... - 03:51 PM Bug #2776 (Resolved): Synchronized send is still blocking after remote server is deactivated.
- *error* Synchronized send is still blocking (until timeout) after remote server is deactivated. Would be nice if the ...
- 03:43 PM Bug #2775 (Resolved): Participant state pattern is not synchron with isActive check.
- *error* java.lang.IllegalStateException: deactivate() cannot be called in state StateInactive
*setup* spread confi... - 03:40 PM Bug #2774 (Resolved): Participant deactivation is blocking forever if the interrupted exception i...
- *error* blocking forever when the interrupted exception is not recovered.
*setup* spread configured via global con... - 03:34 PM Bug #2773 (Resolved): Internal invoke nullpointer not handeled.
- *error* nullpointer not handeled.
*setup* spread configured via global config file but no spread started.
*test...
10/15/2018
- 10:31 AM Enhancement #2772: Uniformed path for System-Config in Windows
- Nope, the preferred path is %%USERPROFILE%%\AppData\Local\<MyCompany>\<MyApp> (see the link above)
Honestly, the onl...
10/12/2018
- 10:58 AM Enhancement #2772: Uniformed path for System-Config in Windows
- Is the .config prefix used on windows normally for the user configuration?
10/09/2018
- 04:34 PM Enhancement #2772 (New): Uniformed path for System-Config in Windows
- Currently, the path where the system-wide rsb.conf lies is not specified under windows. (see: http://docs.cor-lab.org...
- 03:30 PM Bug #2771 (Resolved): UserInfo were not serialized
- While serializing the event, the UserInfo was not serialized. This path fixes it.
- 03:28 PM Feature #2766: RSB RPC pattern
- So, now asynchronous calls are also implemented. Furthermore rsb-error replies can be send and received.
10/08/2018
- 01:44 PM Feature #2765: Implementation of a factory
- Rebased and changed name convention. For some reason c# likes it, to capitalize method names. So be it...
- 01:44 PM Enhancement #2770: Improve Participant creation
- Well, more or less reverted everything but outsourced the connection of the TcpClient from the constructor (see SO-hy...
10/02/2018
- 07:21 PM Tasks #2743 (In Progress): Release version 0.18
- 06:56 PM Enhancement #2195 (Resolved): Implement Spread connection pooling
- 06:55 PM Enhancement #2199 (Resolved): Spread connection pooling for informers [Common Lisp]
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-cl|8a84583f1a2b9e2e39af7e3c52d84f07cd8df6a5.
- 06:55 PM Enhancement #2530 (Resolved): Spread connection pooling for listeners [Common Lisp]
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-cl|8a84583f1a2b9e2e39af7e3c52d84f07cd8df6a5.
10/01/2018
- 02:59 PM Enhancement #2770: Improve Participant creation
- I would say the one, who creates them. Most cases the Factory.
- 02:57 PM Enhancement #2770: Improve Participant creation
- Who would be responsible for caching the results then?
- 02:55 PM Enhancement #2770: Improve Participant creation
- I checked, it is not the system.
But i finally found a reason:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18390715/why-is-... - 02:27 PM Enhancement #2770: Improve Participant creation
- Are you sure this is .net and not your system? Did you try resolving an IP in cmd?
- 02:26 PM Enhancement #2770: Improve Participant creation
- I don't know, why .Net takes so long for that...
Internally, the Factory can resolve the configuration to an IPEnd... - 02:20 PM Enhancement #2770: Improve Participant creation
- But honestly, I don't see why resolving "localhost" is an issue. That should be close to instant. Once the external c...
- 02:13 PM Enhancement #2770: Improve Participant creation
- The Connection will be established through an IPEndPoint object, which can be created outside, thus the user can use ...
- 11:46 AM Enhancement #2770: Improve Participant creation
- Sure, will be done. I see, I probably should only upload finished patches.. my bad. But I saw this one as really neca...
- 11:21 AM Enhancement #2770: Improve Participant creation
- Eh, but host names should be supported. We need DNS resolution. No idea why this is slow on windows.
- 02:16 PM Enhancement #2769 (Resolved): Removing the ascii serializer
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-net|d138e5f686951bf0e213cb9515180dc106d8e5b4.
- 02:10 PM Enhancement #2769: Removing the ascii serializer
- Removed from the default list (commented out).
Also rebased to 531bea6 - 11:42 AM Enhancement #2769: Removing the ascii serializer
- Sure. I wouldn't mind, if it gets removed.
- 11:16 AM Enhancement #2769: Removing the ascii serializer
- Maybe a better solution would be not to include the ascii string converter in the list of default converters at all? ...
- 02:14 PM Feature #2765: Implementation of a factory
- So again, the patch got rebased. Additionally, the user can choose, if he want to give a hostname (which will be reso...
- 11:18 AM Feature #2766: RSB RPC pattern
- Could you provide methods in the (to be added) factory for this similar to the other implementations?
- 11:14 AM Bug #2768 (Resolved): Wrong return of NullConverter
- Applied in changeset commit:rsb-net|531bea667a610c66de41a606699352a547da7ef4.
Also available in: Atom