Activity
From 09/22/2011 to 10/21/2011
10/21/2011
- 08:50 PM Tasks #664: create an event driven configuration interface
- Johannes Wienke wrote:
> yes. it is about parameters for clients in the first place and not about the rsb config its... - 08:32 PM Tasks #664: create an event driven configuration interface
- yes. it is about parameters for clients in the first place and not about the rsb config itself. the motivation was...
- 07:34 PM Tasks #664: create an event driven configuration interface
- Does "configuration" refer to framework aspects (i.e. transports, converters, etc.) or is something like the "ROS Par...
- 12:53 PM Tasks #664 (Rejected): create an event driven configuration interface
- the idea is that we want to provide a kind of config server in rsb. however we do not want that clients are intrinsic...
10/19/2011
- 06:53 PM Tasks #655 (New): Add a TaskExecutor implementation for many delayed tasks
- The current ThreadedTaskExecutor immediately starts a thread for each task. This naive approach may exceed the thread...
- 06:51 PM Tasks #652 (Resolved): Improve task model to allow delays for starting tasks
- Applied in changeset r400.
- 04:58 PM Tasks #652 (Resolved): Improve task model to allow delays for starting tasks
- Comparable behavior to java Timer and TimerTask is required.
- 06:32 PM Enhancement #654 (New): Improve cancellation of Tasks in the delay time
- With the current cancellation system of tasks, waiting threads in waitDone can only be reliably notified about the ca...
- 04:29 PM Bug #651 (Resolved): Singleton has a non-virtual destructor
- Applied in changeset r399.
- 04:27 PM Bug #651 (In Progress): Singleton has a non-virtual destructor
- 04:24 PM Bug #651 (Resolved): Singleton has a non-virtual destructor
- If using the RSC Singleton implementation, gcc warns...
10/13/2011
- 02:00 PM Bug #624 (Resolved): protocol buffers macro does not allow multiple protoroots
- Applied in changeset r385.
- 01:21 PM Bug #624 (Resolved): protocol buffers macro does not allow multiple protoroots
- However protocol buffers itself allows this.
10/12/2011
- 01:51 PM Bug #620 (Resolved): No version information for preprocessor available
- Applied in changeset r379.
- 09:50 AM Bug #620 (In Progress): No version information for preprocessor available
- 09:50 AM Bug #620 (Resolved): No version information for preprocessor available
- We have a version class which is usable at runtime, but not with the preprocessor. It misses defines.
10/05/2011
- 02:01 PM Bug #494 (Resolved): CREATE_GLOBAL_REGISTREE used with 2 arg instead of 3
- Closing this as there is no feedback.
- 01:58 PM Bug #582: java protobuf macro does not honor java_outer_classname in IDL files
- What is still missing here is that the custom cmake-based parsing for package and outer class name definitions ignore...
- 01:57 PM Bug #582 (Resolved): java protobuf macro does not honor java_outer_classname in IDL files
- Applied in changeset r371.
- 09:24 AM Bug #582 (In Progress): java protobuf macro does not honor java_outer_classname in IDL files
09/30/2011
- 08:48 PM Bug #603: Crash on MacOS upon Parsing Environment
- http://agilesoftwaredevelopment.com/blog/mendelt/whos-owner-shared-code-vs-code-ownership ...
- 08:38 PM Bug #603: Crash on MacOS upon Parsing Environment
- This is your component ;)
- 06:25 PM Bug #603 (Closed): Crash on MacOS upon Parsing Environment
- Backtrace is as follows:...
Also available in: Atom