Activity

From 09/25/2014 to 10/24/2014

10/24/2014

11:07 AM Enhancement #2063: simplify clumsy usage of DebugTools
I worked on all the points you pointed out. However, I didn't touched StackWalker itself.
You should decide how to d...
R. Haschke
10:26 AM Enhancement #2063: simplify clumsy usage of DebugTools
Robert Haschke wrote:
> I can work on that some time.
> I suggest to keep the StackWalker code as is. I didn't touc...
J. Wienke

10/23/2014

05:04 PM Enhancement #2063: simplify clumsy usage of DebugTools
I can work on that some time.
I suggest to keep the StackWalker code as is. I didn't touched anything there yet and ...
R. Haschke
03:07 PM Enhancement #2063 (In Progress): simplify clumsy usage of DebugTools
This issue cannot be resolved as long as things aren't in the master branch. ;)
Thanks for the work. I am fine wit...
J. Wienke
02:25 PM Feature #2047: Provide deprecated macro for static methods
You need to use this in the header, probably. Did you try that? J. Wienke

10/22/2014

10:20 PM Enhancement #2063 (Resolved): simplify clumsy usage of DebugTools
- extract + demangle C++ function names on Linux commit:43ee009
- removed class DebugTools, expose functions createB...
R. Haschke
02:30 PM Enhancement #2065 (Resolved): Unintuitive exception in rsc::os::getProgramName in case of invalid...
Applied in changeset commit:rsc|634e92ddd16cffadec09a10579dc7283247def2f. J. Wienke
01:47 PM Enhancement #2065 (Resolved): Unintuitive exception in rsc::os::getProgramName in case of invalid...
See #2058 for the original issue.... J. Wienke

10/18/2014

10:49 AM Enhancement #2063 (In Progress): simplify clumsy usage of DebugTools
Using backtrace functions requires a DebugTools object. Why did you choose for this rather clumsy design?
Instead ...
R. Haschke

10/08/2014

01:00 PM Feature #2047 (Rejected): Provide deprecated macro for static methods
Provide a @DEPRECATED@ macro for static methods and the according test. The current deprecated macros does not seem t... Anonymous

10/07/2014

10:49 AM Bug #2042 (Resolved): semantics of rsc::runtime::Properties::set() not conform to documentation
While the doc says:
Sets a new property in the map. If a property with this name exits, the
new one will not ...
R. Haschke
 

Also available in: Atom