Meetings2012-02-16 » History » Version 12

J. Moringen, 02/16/2012 05:13 PM

1 1 J. Moringen
h1. Meetings 2012-02-16
2 1 J. Moringen
3 1 J. Moringen
h2. Configuration Service
4 1 J. Moringen
5 2 J. Moringen
h3. Nomenclature
6 2 J. Moringen
7 7 J. Moringen
* Configuration (Framework level)
8 7 J. Moringen
** Converter [implemented]
9 7 J. Moringen
** Transports (+ quality of service) [implemented]
10 7 J. Moringen
** Error handling [implemented]
11 8 J. Moringen
** (Renaming of) scope names [not implemented]
12 7 J. Moringen
*** Are these renaming rules, which are applied at participant creation time?
13 7 J. Moringen
*** Do they affect scopes or participants?
14 9 J. Moringen
* Parameter Service (Domain level)
15 9 J. Moringen
** Component parameters
16 9 J. Moringen
*** Component-specific configuration has to be possible
17 9 J. Moringen
*** Changable at runtime?
18 2 J. Moringen
19 1 J. Moringen
h3. Requirements
20 2 J. Moringen
21 4 J. Moringen
* Remapping of scope names
22 4 J. Moringen
** Remapping on the program-level is sufficient (i.e. participant level is not needed)
23 1 J. Moringen
** Recursive renaming has be possible
24 10 J. Moringen
** The remapping mechanism is applied when participants are instantiated
25 12 J. Moringen
** Look at ROS's approach: syntax should be similar, when possible
26 1 J. Moringen
27 11 J. Moringen
* Reconfiguration of participants is not required
28 11 J. Moringen
** Should be handled by next layer:
29 11 J. Moringen
**# Destroy participant
30 11 J. Moringen
**# Change configuration
31 11 J. Moringen
**# Re-create participant
32 11 J. Moringen
33 5 J. Moringen
* Configuration mechanism has to be suitable for component layer (e.g. CCA)