Tasks #800

Discuss package names

Added by M. Goetting almost 10 years ago. Updated over 8 years ago.

Status:ClosedStart date:01/13/2012
Priority:NormalDue date:
Assignee:-% Done:

0%

Category:-
Target version:Robotics Service Bus - rsb-0.9

Description

We should discuss the package names on the package server.
Most of the packages named as follows <PROJEKT-NAME>0.3-0.3.0_lucid_i686.deb

  • Why is the version number included twice?
  • Is there a reason for that?
  • Could we find a more simplified naming schema?!

History

#1 Updated by J. Moringen almost 10 years ago

The general scheme seems to be as follows

The Debian binary package file names conform to the following convention: <foo>_<VersionNumber>-<DebianRevisionNumber>_<DebianArchitecture>.deb

In case of co-existing major versions (e.g. Python 2.6 and Python 3.0) <foo> has to contain the major version (e.g. <foo> = python2.6) in order to independently maintain theses packages and make them selectable in packaging tools.

#2 Updated by J. Moringen over 9 years ago

  • Target version set to rsb-0.9

#3 Updated by J. Wienke over 9 years ago

Will we ever be able to resolve this issue or should we just close it and reopen of we find something more concrete after the last discussions?

#4 Updated by J. Moringen almost 9 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Feedback

We pretty much agreed on this now, didn't we? I think, we can close this issue.

#5 Updated by J. Moringen over 8 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Closed

Also available in: Atom PDF